|
|
Cathodic inhibitors are generally less effective than the anodic type. In contrast, they often form a visible film along the cathode surface, which polarizes the metal by restricting the access of dissolved oxygen to the metal substrate. The film also acts to block hydrogen evolution sites and prevent the resultant depolarizing effect.
As we started to feed the cathodic inhibitor, as the concentration remains at lo9w level, no significant effect in the genaral corrosion rate will be monitored. This is because the metal dissolution is taking place in the anodes, and the anodic reactions remain unchanged, having sufficient cathodic half sels potential, to combine with. Of course
as the concentration of the inhibi When we start to lower the inhibitors concentration, as it is presented in the right video, after a delay, nacessary for the reactivation of the cathodic sites, the general corrosion rate increases again to reach the value of the corrosion rate of the untreated system. Under the same conditions, if we examined the pitting tendency as a function of the inhibitor concentration, we obtain a similar graph. The activity of the differential aeration cells (under deposit attack), follows the same way, because the area under the deposit is the anode, while the sourrounding fre metal aerea became the cathode. So the cathode remains available to the cathodic inhibitor to act, and being deactivated, the under the deposit existing anode is deactivated due to the cathodic potantial unavailability to combine with it.
|
|
|